THE RULE
Not only a cross
A paper marked outside the box, otherwise than by a cross, or with more than one mark is not void for that reason if the voter's intention clearly appears.
Test a mark
HOW THE COUNT WORKS
INTENTION clearly appears
The ballot paper asks for a cross. Not everyone draws one.
At every UK count, some papers carry ticks, ticks and crosses, words or nothing at all. The law sets out what makes a paper void, and a test for the rest: does the voter's intention clearly appear? This independent guide explains how that works.
Updated
Test a markTHE SHORT ANSWER
The Parliamentary Elections Rules list what is void.
Then they give a test for unusual marks.
THE RULE
A paper marked outside the box, otherwise than by a cross, or with more than one mark is not void for that reason if the voter's intention clearly appears.
Test a markVOID
No official mark, votes for more than one candidate, writing that could identify the voter, or unmarked or void for uncertainty.
See real numbersAT THE COUNT
Doubtful papers go to the returning officer or a deputy. Guidance says the whole paper is considered, case by case.
How it is doneGeneral information only, not legal advice. For advice on your own situation, speak to a qualified lawyer or a free advice service.
TEST A MARK
Pick a way a ballot paper might be marked to see how the law and counting guidance treat it. The bar shows how likely the paper is to be rejected.
Based on rule 47 of the Parliamentary Elections Rules (Representation of the People Act 1983, Schedule 1) and Electoral Commission and Chief Counting Officer adjudication guidance. Each paper is judged on its own; this is general information, not legal advice.
ONE REAL COUNT
Returning officers publish how many papers were rejected,
and why. One Scottish declaration from July 2024:
166 of 44,014
Ballot papers rejected
An Aberdeenshire Council declaration for the 4 July 2024 UK Parliamentary election reports 166 rejected papers, against 44,014 votes cast.
ONE CONSTITUENCY · JULY 2024
156 of 166
Unmarked or void for uncertainty
Of the rest, 7 gave votes for more than one candidate, 2 had no official mark and 1 had writing by which the voter could be identified.
SAME COUNT · BY REASON
Rule 47 requires the returning officer to draw up a statement showing the number of papers rejected under each of the four heads. This one count is an illustration, not a national figure.
HOW ADJUDICATION WORKS

Drawn from the rules and Electoral Commission guidance for counts in Great Britain.
Papers with no official mark, more than one vote, identifying writing, or no clear vote go to the returning officer or an appointed deputy.
Guidance says the whole paper is considered, and each one is decided on its own merits.
Does the intention to vote for one candidate clearly appear, without the marks identifying the voter?
Rejected papers are marked 'rejected', with 'rejection objected to' added if a counting agent objects, and the totals are published.
CASE LAW

The rules give the test; election cases have shown how to apply it. The 2014 Chief Counting Officer's guide draws on Levers v Morris, which it says supports the idea that a voter can show a choice by exclusion, and stresses giving proper effect to the word 'clearly'.
Electoral Commission guidance from 2019 notes that, following Ruffle v Rogers, a ballot paper on which the name of a candidate or party is written can be allowed for them, while a general slogan may leave the intention unclear.
Questions
The rules expect a cross. But rule 47 says a paper marked otherwise than by a cross is not void for that reason alone, if the voter's intention clearly appears and the mark does not identify the voter.
Rule 47 lists four heads: no official mark, votes for more than one candidate, writing or a mark that could identify the voter (other than the printed number on the back), and unmarked or void for uncertainty.
The returning officer, or a deputy appointed to adjudicate. Candidates' counting agents can object, and the paper is then endorsed 'rejection objected to'.
They are not counted as votes, but rule 47 requires a statement showing how many papers were rejected under each head. Aberdeenshire Council's July 2024 declaration, for example, lists them by reason.
No. doodlevotes is an independent informational guide. It is not an electoral body, party or campaign, and it quotes the law and official guidance with links.
Sources
ABOUT THIS NAME
doodlevotes.com is part of the DoodleSale portfolio. It isn't in an auction right now, but you can ask about leasing it.